<?xml version="1.0"?>

<rss version="2.0">

   <channel>

      <title>Technicalinfo.net Security</title>

      <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net</link>

      <description>Security thoughts and observations of Gunter Ollmann</description>

      <language>en-us</language>

      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 APR 2008 19:10:00 EST</lastBuildDate>

      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>

      <copyright>Copyright 2008, Gunter Ollmann</copyright>

      <item>

         <title>Patching A Sick Health Care System</title>

         <description>After some time away, I'm back to writing for SC Magazine. This months article covers the problems in patching the embedded systems used in the heath care organizations.</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20080423_HealthCarePatching.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Wed, 23 APR 2008 19:10:00 EST</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>

         <title>2007 Vulnerability Disclosure Rates</title>

         <description>According to X-Force, there has been a 5.4 percent year-on-year decrease in the annual disclosure of new vulnerabilities. Why? In this blog entry I examine the probable influences in the decrease - decreasing vulnerability appeal, vendor security testing improvements, professional bug-hunters and vulnerability purchase programs...</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20080210_2007VulnerabilityCounts.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:50:00 EST</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>

         <title>The Pharming Guide - Part 2</title>

         <description>The Pharming Guide provides detailed analysis of the pharming threat. This second part covers in detail the attack vectors used to conduct the attack and the protection elements needed to secure against the threat.</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/papers/Pharming2.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:00:00 EST</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>

         <title>The Pharming Guide - Part (1)</title>

         <description>The Pharming Guide provides detailed analysis of the pharming threat. This first part covers the nature of the threat and a detailed analysis of how DNS actually works in the real world.</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/papers/Pharming.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:00:00 EST</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>

         <title>User-Agent Attacks</title>

         <description>How can you automatically 0wn a Web site the next time the administrator logs in? Through the User-Agent field of your Web browser of course! A fabulous example of second-order cross-site scripting.</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20080121_UserAgentAttacks.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:55:00 EST</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>

         <title>Hacking a Boeing 787?</title>

         <description>The FAA document entitled “Special Conditions: Boeing Model 787-8 Airplane; Systems and Data Networks Security--Isolation or Protection From Unauthorized Passenger Domain Systems Access” raises the possibility of mile-high hacking a fly-by-wire, multi-million dollar, aircraft.</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20080107_HackingBoeing787.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>

         <title>WHOIS XSS</title>

         <description>There's been a little fuss over a recent posting concerning the threat of WHOIS cross-site scripting. To get your attention, it starts with “This is massive.” Now don’t get me wrong, there is a threat, but it is marginal – and I’ll explain why in a little bit. What’s all the fuss about?</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20080104_WhoisXSS.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:45:00 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>

         <title>Hacking Barcodes</title>

         <description>"Barcode systems susceptible to serious hacker attacks" - so says Heise Security, in their article posted yesterday concerning FX's presentation at this weeks 24th Chaos Communication Congress. The article describes a few of the threats to systems that rely upon barcodes (on and two dimensional) - in particular their ease of manipulation for scamming purposes and the possibilities for code injection attacks. </description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20080101_HackingBarcodes.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:47:00 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>

         <title>Commercial Keyloggers</title>

         <description>Commercial keyloggers are designed for use by corporate IT/Security/Audit teams and law enforcement agencies, and they're way more advanced than their malware cousins.</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20071230_CommercialKeylogger.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
         <title>Professional Keylogging</title>

         <description>Whether it's deployed in hardware or software formats, for as long as people rely upon password protected authentication processes, the keylogger will continue to be a reliable hacking tool.</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20071222_HardwareKeyloggers.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
         <title>Little Pinkie</title>

         <description>In short (pun intended), females suggest that Australian boy racers are somewhat lacking in the trouser department.  Apparently the campaign has been a roaring success and has helped reduce speeding down under.</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20071016_LittlePinkie.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

      <item>
         <title>Pained by Security Analogies</title>

         <description>Whenever I have to resort to using some kind of physical-world analogy to explain an Internet security principle, I can't but feel that I'm doing a disservice to the people listening.  Depending upon the audiences involved, my analogies have ranged far and wide.</description>

         <link>http://www.technicalinfo.net/blog/security/20070921_SecurityAnalogies.html</link>
         
         <author>Gunter Ollmann</author>

         <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>

      </item>

   </channel>

</rss>
